Range & Frequency

In understanding nature, we must a least observe from two point of view: subjeck and object.  This view of science has been held by many persona, including me, to actually observe a system of a function in people.  For example, we wouldn't know what to be if we we didn't not what have us becoming to.  In this section, we would describe about the to be and didn't have us becoming to.

Let's talk about range.  What is range? is it the same with mean? some people may ask.  Range and mean are different.  Basically range are the delivery of opponance, or must we call the differences between two point.  Can it be anything?  Of course, it can be whatever we want, from observation into tiny details like our daily basis needs.  Mean is something we would like to achieve from a goal urgency.

Then, if we may ask like a scientist, what becomes frequency then?  Basically when we talk about frequency, we talk about nature.  We talk about efficiency and defisit.  We talk about how much per squaremeter.  Frequency is like a line of strings when we pull and observe the trigger, we may find a solution.  The function of frequency is of course to tell the differences between black and white, red and yellow, and so on so forth.

What is the minimum deposit between range & frequency?  That is one good question.  If we want to tray a blue line between the two, we must consider a statistical method.  In one statistical method, one can see many things, from refubrication of datas, entry of name of people, entry of luggage and so on.  The blue line is the more frequency omitted the less range we ought to get.  For example, if you are a soprano, the higher the frequency, the smallets range we ought to get, like maybe only one octave.  From this view, we can say that frequency and range are reciprocal to each other.  They don't commonly correlate, but they has something in motion which makes them somewhat insaparable in science.