Sciences apart, people from different areas had tried to define things from philosophy. The first was Archimides who faithfully admit his existence through the polemic of atom through the thinking of his predecessor; Socrates. Time after time, new thinking had emerged as from the elements of nature, the indivisible parts of matters until the description of space introduced by Renee Descartes (1596 to 1650), Descart was describing space as four exclusionary divisible parts in the four Quad, The First Quad from the right up to The Fourth Quad on the down right, each happened to be counter-clockwise definite with approximation of measurements. This was the beginning of pattern behavior recognition of human cognitive process.
Time after time, many scientists and mathematicians discovered new languages and technologies to thoroughly understand nature, one of the approach was cellular automata, the fourrier series, power series, up to the newest sugar based model anatomy of human blood stream in medical physics. These advancements had many distinguished features to create a better life in humanity at large and all society.
Pattern. Pattern means a period repetition, a pattern could be a palette of changes in the DNA, a fractal mode of Batik, a directions you go to school everyday, and even your time to sleep, play, and study every night. Following a pattern means dissecting yourself into a period of continuous changes.
Recognition. To reckon something means to understand and know that something has certain properties. A reckoning means an awaken state of conscious to become aware of whatever that is being observe. In this matter recognition refer to a dilluted perspective of having to see or cling to a certain reference frame of knowing, thinking, plausing, and finally creating. It could be starting simply as your pattern of making your homework after going back from work or school.
There are many methods to approach a pattern. In this article I would enlight at the least two methods of an approach to recognising a pattern. First is chaos and order phenomenology approach, the second is rythmical periodic approach; verily intact with understanding of fourrier and harmonics.
Chaos is a state of disorder. A chaos means there are nothing tangible enough for us to recognize and even to interact with that state to actually conclude that something was somewhat or somewhat was somehow or some sort. Simply, it is the entangled wool of your cat on its favorites night; it's undefineable.
Order, in the other sense, is state of rest. State of clarity between which is what and what is how. It is like seeing a pretty and fine roads with the cars lining in the same speed and velocity. Everything is clearly predictable. Everything is in conduct of clean and calmness. Sometimes, it is quite rigid to changes and verily detached from quakes.
Approaching a recognition of pattern through chaos and order could be made by seeing the phenomenon of such objective that is being observe e.g. the phenomena of occultism in the dark ages. We could actually see the science behind such phenomenon dramatically by seeing five thorough questions of what, who, where, how, why such things happened. What were the variables of change towards the chaos, was occultism a chaos or dark ages were chaos? Which was the state of order? How would one define that there is such thing as occultism in the dark ages? And such forth.
Second approach is rythmical periodic approach. A pattern should have a definite means of initiality. In this sense, an initial could be the first point of a sine crests approaching it first cartesian point to create another crests or simply the start of wave in a wavelength. A rythm if succeeded to precede a term of multiplications could then be called harmonics. A harmonic is a state where everything is periodically predictable and observable through at the minimum, a mathematical understanding.
How then should be approach pattern through rythmical approach? As it is said, a pattern could then be define through fourrier function in which define the initial and the form of periodic quasi-stable changes in a term. As such, then power functions would then be extensify in the means of complexion.
Finally, as such things are there so existed. What would then be the use of a pattern, anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment