Quantum State

In defining physical problems in physics, we need a frame of reference.  Whether it is a frame of reference in problems mode or theoretical mode.  A frame of reference is such a system that we sees a physical problems from.  There two kind of reference we know in modern Einstenian Physics: Inertial Frame of Reference and non-Inertial Frame of Reference.  But, we will leave it to that two differences now.  What we would be rather seeing now is theoretical frame of reference.

Theoretically, physics are defined into two mainstreams: Classical Physics & Modern Physics.  In classical physics, we studied about Newton's Laws, Conservation of Energies, and Classical Mechanics.  They are designed to study the daily problems of physics concerning things that are identical to matters seen by eyes.  In defining physics, there are two other theories that needed to be included though: Modern Physics with its Relativity Theory and Quantum Physics.

We will leave relativity to other discussion.  In this discussion we would like to introduce more to Quantum Physics, especially the state that defined in Quantum.

Quantum holds the physical problems concerning micro matters.  It studied photons, schrodinger equation, spins and nuclear energies.  In quantum, we understand that atomic matters stands in strands of quarks; yet, in this discussion we would narrow it down to Protons, Electrons and Neutrons to make it easier to define.  In the atomic matters, Neutrons are known to have neutral charge whilst Proton held positive charge and Electrons are negative inversely.  In Bohr atomic model, we find that Protons and Neutrons are held as the Nuclei of an atom with electron orbiting the pseudo-stationary position of it.  In quantum, we understand that Electrons held in orbits.  These orbits are then elected into shells.  To make electrons fill the shell correctly, we should understand that Quantum Physics held theories about Quantum State.

Quantum State are the tools we know to create the most exclusive station of atomic matters.  In quantum, we understand that there are three kinds of state, the n state, l state, and m state which then describes parity, or the odd or evenness of a nuclei.  n state is the basic state.  In this state, we understand that an atom, more likely Hydrogen with one electron and proton and no neutrons, has the ground state of n = 1.  n is an integer with number bigger than zero.

Next, we understand that there is l state of an atom.  This state then describes the spin place of an electron which goes on the famously s,p,d,f place in high school chemistry.   Yet we would understand that there are more than s,p,d,f states, it includes into f,h, and so on. l state are equated into l = n-1.  So, every n state has one number lower of l state.

m state.  m state are known as the parity decoder.  m state is the spin state of the electrons.  In one n = 2 state, it is an l = 1 state, while for the m it is m = 0, +1, -1 state.  So, there are three possible place of state to the electron to have.  Then if the energies are known we could measure whether the energies are degenerated or no.  Degeneration means that there are couples of l state that makes one amount of the same energies.

by Chandra Indra Purnama aka Muhammad Sadhra Ali

Hysterical Creativity

Looking at life into the heavens could make us think once more whether heavens really existed in reality, the now reality, or is it just a corpuscular past that sent information from light to earth.  Exceedingly, it is too beautiful to resists that heavens do not exist.  Ontologically, heaven exist as probability of space-time construction, yet it also could be seen as past-lives of stars seeing from earth.  If we see the meta-knowledge of it, stars are only constellation with typically disturbing human nature as energy, so as the astrologers said.  Yet, we would not know what happens to stars and heavenly bodies because we are stranded in three dimensional space and bounded by time dimension.

Seeing from heavens to earth beings, we could really see a built of creativity in human brain that made stars constellation understood as it is today.  I call it hysterical creativity.  Why?  It is caused by the meaning of hysterical which means a chaotic view of things.  Stars are chaos if we do not understand astronomy, yet it is a beauty for those who understood it.  It can be also derived to love if we see it as romantic beings.  The creativity in human minds make them fully created as beauty, seeing from inside to the outside.

Rendering creativity, science are full of it.  First, from the extravagant view of atoms, and also all to space-time general relativity continuum.  Science especially physics needs a lot of creativity to be understood, if not they are only groups of philosophy and mathematical matters without any meanings. Hysterical creativity is needed to pull out the cavity of dullness in science.  Something could be interesting if we could be hysterical in seeing it as creativity matters.  It is only disturbing to see something only from point of view of basics knowledge rather than all beautiful correspondence of life into the knowledge.  As we see, girls and boys wouldn't be together in love as scientific knowledge to curiosity and creativity.  It is all that matters.

Sesitivity; Is it only in human?

Basic understanding of sensitivity comes from the meltdown of a matter through corpuscular activity concerning light.  Basically, corpuscular light hit a target, after that, what would happen to the target?  That is sensitivity.  Some people may recall that sensitivity only targets on human, yes it is first observed in human act and devour but, it also applies to matters.  When matter tries to be defined by something else, the accordance of the self towards the situation defined would create an amount of sensitivity on something undefined.  This undefined is feeling.  This is the bridge reality of matter, soul, consciousness, and forces.

Sensitivity can be order of chaos in feeling.  Seeing it that way, we could say that matter actually has feelings.  Matter and atoms reacts towards an act of human yet slower not as fast phased as human does.  We are somewhat related to a car, our own car.  It is owned, yet the machine also has accordingly owned perspective if it is living.  That is the thing that I want to emphasized.  Our behavior towards an enactment of nature could disturb other natures.  This is what we understand as sensitivity being, not matter though.

Sensitivity matter is explained as such.  When a glass of hot water being poured into a cup it tends to make the cup enlarged for somewhat.  How much enlargement would it get?  That's not sensitivity, but how many taken prior would the glass be moved and somewhat cracked, the limit within it.  That's sensitivity.  How much time to take the glass to break? that could probably called pseudo-sensitivity.  The real sensitivity is the back down of forces taking a matter into chaotic distribution.  The limit of chaos and the handling of chaos, those are sensitivity.

So, if a matter doesn't act as we expected, then there could be a high lacking sensitivity of the target prior to Scale of Priority.

Scale of Priority: Analysis and Description

Concerning ELPS, we have, as we discussed, scale of priority as a factor.  This is the basic factor to describe love particle besides sensitivity of a matter.  In this review, we would like to indulge more about scale of priority, what it is, how it was, and what is it all about.

If we see a floating space-station, let say, Hubble, in the outer-space, we would first think of how it works.  Well that is not the case for scale of priority, rather what we want to see is the behavior of such station to the surroundings.  What is the first thing it would do before anything else happened to it?  What is the first curiosity it made?  Well, that's scale of priority.  It is not how things work, but how they elapsed to the work.  It is not how things made, but how the behavior made it through.

In the other mean, scale of priority could be described as the scale of 'what to do first' before one event is done.  Considering human life, it is what on the first list we want to do the most.  If we want to elaborate, it is a system of lists in data matrices to decide what comes first and what comes last.  As an asteroid moving, before they meet other space matters, what do they decide first what to do? That's the question arisen.

Scale of priority has a lot deal in deducting love theory and go on to ELPS.  It is the basics of all love creation.  Love appears as a whip, like blush, it goes to your face before you knowing that you are blushing.  It is the only stand alone feelings, the basics of all feeling in your heart.  Disregarding the fact that it is neural system effect, it has more to it than a hormonal response.  It has a lot of dealing towards the existence of one matter to the declaring exist to other matters.  You can not for instance have hormones before knowing what made the hormone exist, or we cannot tell there are neurons if we don't see any consciousness within.

From my view neuron has replica in matters.  Just as neurons build one human alive, a similar electrical charge pulls a matter together.  So, electro-weak and strong autonomy appears not only in human but mainly in atoms and matters.  Those are not so different story.  The differentiation is only on their free-will.  Human activate their free-will (Hypnology) through making decisions while matters find their free-will in their interaction as such gravity and pulls out forces.  Those forces are their compacted free-will in one formulated non-bio natural system.

Scale of priority is one of the most crucial base to understand ELPS and love theory.  It has a lot of frames discussed for many probability and possibility of a physical event to happen.  Without scale of priority we wouldn't know where a body will go first if we don't know which has the bigger force.