Artificial Intelligent Inabilities over Human Intellects

There are mainly three things in which robots or human creation cannot do: choosing a choice instantly out of free-will, intuitive thinking of creativity to feels feeling and complete prudent reproduction.

Why so?

First, looking towards brain-functions and complexities, human are an excels complex of being differ than robots, no matter how complex thus robots are or in this case, brain-ware, it is impossible for a brain-ware to be active without user.  While in mind complexities the user of mankind are their conscience.

It is such an impossibilities for engines to have free-will.  Free-will are not random improbabilities over luck, free-will are mere human intellect to study and also choose prudently.  While a computer, mechanical engines, robot and alike may lasts for centuries yet not one had yet owned the capabilities of free-will.  Thus yet, interestingly robot can memorize better than human yet it is only caused by object-user perspective over data placement, not a responsible reaction over one free-will and interests.

Second, robot AI may think over things and solve problems yet it cannot integrate intuition like animals, mammals, or other biotic.  To create an algorithms that define intuition is nearly impossible. A car only can avoid danger but not to instantly safe all the people in it.  It is a common notice also that car can only hints where the nearest gas-station but cannot want that gas-station at will.  AI also may not hurdles research as much as human can create a mean; e.g. meaningful poem.

It would be such an interesting founding if we may see car that is thirsty over fuel and instantly go for the gas-station without anyone recognition; a system of algorithms may not change the DNA strands by itself except that a sample of such complexities are infused.  There are creative robots that may recreate from pattern as such that possibilities over which design unto which one, yet robot cannot choose which one is more beautiful than others unto mood also without being a user intact to the AI memories of multifunctional-wares thus made us able to intuitively recognize feelings.

Third, the last but not least is that AI cannot reproduce as how we complete a prudent reproduction by itself, it needs a host to do so, and if only that a robot may give births, it is only the artificial womb that works within an in-vitro of human based cells of sperm and ovaries.  It cannot happen that a robot impregnate other robots.  It is queer to see that AI may only give us a glimpse of realities but not the whole pictures with its meaningful content as well as contentment.

To noticing thus, we need to re-think, that our Civilization as human had been made centuries over centuries while AI are developed only in mere of this millennium, AI can only correct and not create without user. AI cannot be without its algorithms over all bodily system organs and most perpetuated stems.

In conclusion of this discussion over the inabilities of Artificial Intelligent over Human Intellects are that maybe one day there are going to be many wonders of innovations even totally human-like robot AI and so on, yet nothing can withdrawn that human are not the perfect creation perhaps over other up-going evolution to be better creatures; well, nobody knows when if we can create angels for reals by all that we have right to tell you some fantasy?  Perhaps, Christmas is going to be so different and the gifts are not sent by spooky point of a distant anyway, only the future when its present may solve the Schrodinger Cat whether it is dead or alive, we can only likened. Thus are the AI Inabilities over Human Intellects so far that I may think and argue of.

Frame of References & Relative Perspectives

Everyone who had studied Physics in Undergraduate must have crossed the special and general theories of relativity; thus lemma known through Einstein's Universe and Space-Time.  Although that happens to be true if and only if we observe two different vector changes in different frame referential.

One would know that though there may exists a particle which travel faster than light in pico-seconds, light-speed are still the common use of Physics generalization of Newtonian Fundamental Forces.  Perhaps thus momentum and impuls are not to be progressive but regressive, we may seen that as if violation of Thermodynamics are not unusual, yet understood that the Laws of Thermodynamics had to be obeyed for any Thermal and Dynamics to coexists as an order of science and Physics.

Though, why should one use frame of reference in relativity, especially in General Relativity?

Frame of reference are crucial understanding in mending General to Special Relativity.  Thus, also known as Referential Frame, this is one core understanding of the standing object of observation in human perspectives.  Surely we can change any frame of references to study things Astrophysical, yet we need to understand that in hyper mode, holograms tends to drawn things insufficiently, as such that light are the subject of measuring boundaries of lemmas and relativity of Einstein's Theorems.

As how it predominantly exhorted, in Einsteinian view, Space and Time are tangled just like DNA strands in biologi-molecular, yet this manner is not as dynamics.  For Einstein, Space comes as how Time also withdrawn, thus definition can make time as real when space are relatives.  By thus understanding we can see relative perspectives of Referential Frames.  This are also being studied by Hudson, and Heisenberg.  Uncertainty principle of Heisenberg makes do of other works by Pauli and Lagrange that Dirac measurement was correct, this somewhat shown as if Relativity are merely happening of Cosmological Constraints.  Yet, is that so?  What if the C as speed constant are changed into Bosons?

Some speculation are sought in Relative Perspectives, if and only if C = Bosons, any Referential Frames are relative too in its contingency of Perspectives.  E.g., a Singularity that is measured in C would fall when the Mandelbrot Series approaching infinity or are divided by zero matrix, yet when it is changed to Bosons, matter gets mass quicker than light this may make Physics think that time is holographic or else that reality are just perceptions.  These hyper-space inhibition by Richard G. made us known that spanning rheology of space-time is not as simple as fixing rhea-static of morphing roads.  This has made Referential Frame are Relative towards Perspectives Objection and of Observation upon the observer.

In conclusion of this discussion, Relative Perspectives may happen when Quantum and General Relativity are inter-tangled in observation depends on the observer main constraints.