Have you ever lost somewhere about anything to talk to? As an example, you had met the love of your life, have you ever thought of an inability to talk to that person? Like those buzz over the stomachs and butterfly over your tummy, Physics also has its buzzes and butterflies over like frame over frame of the perspectives in relativity to the frames over frames of how our loved ones appear in our minds.
If, buzzers actually do have romance, then perhaps physics would also have flux. Flux are verily strict over how the subjects of Electrodynamics made robust in the certainty on how such works over such, just like if you ever met a forming wind into tornado sometimes you can felt that the wind had changed however. The Pedagogy of Scientific Methods are strict on it course when we go describing the commons between Words to Physics and Communications unto Universes.
As robots uses algorithms to function, Physics needed formulations of logic's-lemma-theories to structures. In the links between robots and Physics it could be seen verily clear that all Physics basic norms always stated by three variables of comparative just like robot has three basics functional structures in its anticipations of the algorithmic datum.
Yet, also everything have basic fundamentals thus cannot be breached by each normative, jargon, and even tiny little bits of the utilization.
Languages are not laws, then a datum would neither meant an alphabet. Says that, a variable of Voltage are V, Current are I, and Resistance are R, then V = I x R, yet it is not so that / -r -s in cmd. would be the same with I, You, We, and They in English Language. The basics iteration would be agoristic to the grammar yet not generalized as colloquial. This is an example of Robots Language:
This is an example of expert to advanced bio-system language (English Poetry):
As how we can see it, there are certain 'strangeness' in between these two orders, yet in some 'masses' both used a very different normative complexities in between theirs lucrative in between one packs of commands with a set of metaphors.
In other manners, we can see, these as advanced comparatives; these are complexities in Mathematical Accumulations of Frame Referential in Cosmology:
Both needed endurance, intellects, severe analytic, and perseverance generally speaking. So, could you ask your own-selves, "Does a dot in the mode of Morse Code really do not make any difference for the Cosmological Pattern if ever a dot were a glimpse of another luminescence of a star shown?"
Keep that to yourself so that you would make your own interpretation to the random sample that were asked.
Next, can you think of a mathematical elephant? What do you see on your mind? Keep it there. Now, see a real elephant by searching on google. Now, even though thus were similar in trigger, does that generally norms as 'elephant'? It's just like saying that if all E = M x C x C, then all frame of reference to see an event in spherical conics of space-time Grand Theory would means that to see all lights as a static energy objects. Yet, Thermodynamic has stated some in inferring mathematical constant that essentially Thermal are events that happen caused by dynamics in a process of progression. Sometimes, it made me think that perhaps an AC/DC electronics would have a point of biased engineering if ever the environment are too dynamics; just imagine trying to fix a broken amplifier in a vacuum and fixing it on let's say 0.78 ATM world-like overview. It's like using C++ without using a procedural methods yet reluctant by only copy-pasting the codes without knowing that as procedures or else sub-freezing the algorithm essentials for else if maintenance of robotic procedural trashes. That would someday destroyed an satellite of servers if ever the data sent unto were unable to be recycled into something else, and perhaps valuated the main use of computing into recycling digital data; which means perhaps using bosonic nuclear properties to biased the use of computer into light recycling machine rather than computing methods.
These has benefits also reluctance, the good thing is perhaps only by using enough microns to cosmology we could measures the evidence to Grand Theories yet, these could also meant in the sustainability that computers need to be possessed are considered to be basics right perhaps as the same as trees and houses. So, perhaps we may see that manipulations of nature are more succulent which needs some orders to also create a typical algorithms to enable thus Technologies to be able to 'Communicate' freely with Natures. I had a view that perhaps algorithms one day could actually help the genomic principles of nature only perhaps up to botanies, not to induce chemicals or interest based medicines, yet to dynamically create a, per-say, a botanic tree that is able to spread wi-fi through one of its instances, or a stone to sent a message if ever a person were missing in a jungle just by temporarily changing its features.
So, in accumulation of this abstractions article is that perhaps Physics Govern Universes just like dreams at night taking our subconscious words into someone else's dream at certain stage of brain activity just to send a simple word like, 'I Love You, I Miss You, Forgiveness, or Just I am Okay.'
Well, just say that words are to be seen as reality of our tastes, then it is just parallel that world are just a reality to our eyes, then what are the true realities of other senses?
Think for yourself, whether or not Physics does govern the universe like the words do to communications, does doing the wrong grammar felt similar to putting the wrong variables when it comes into communicating a case in laws with the outcome of scientific experiments?
Well, for me the difference are only that words could hypnotize while physics can mesmerizing-magnetized: and yes both are magical and fun when thus are successful! In fact, the delta of statistics are just means of risks and improbabilities; still, nothing are 100% for anything even if you are a physicists or only a linguist or even a prophet of the olds because everything are a system that always make a different, wrong, right, unused or even important, to the whole thing, since cosmology start perhaps even when start do begin or start. True that nothing can know the meaning of a physical norms until we understand that its philosophy and its engineering usage are understood completely and full essentially felt just like a crush to that cute girl or boy in the class. Well, do not get confused though because sometimes stressful atmosphere can mistake us to seeing I = L.U for love confessions rather than calculating the engineering impedance of a civil-mechanization system. So, do not falsely see mechantronics as lover robots, since a joke can never make a robot give you children out of making love can it? Unless you are half robots, perhaps you might not felt this little weirdness of illusion to delusional instantaneous images.
Well, in short conclusion abstraction are nonetheless a choice for us to philosophically choose how to creatively imagine the right answer to a problem with correctness and simplification to be understood by the problem givers and solvers.
Resources:
- MIT Open License Lecture from Youtube
- Math-Semantics
- Modules of Python and Arduino Uno
