Artificial Intelligent Inabilities over Human Intellects

There are mainly three things in which robots or human creation cannot do: choosing a choice instantly out of free-will, intuitive thinking of creativity to feels feeling and complete prudent reproduction.

Why so?

First, looking towards brain-functions and complexities, human are an excels complex of being differ than robots, no matter how complex thus robots are or in this case, brain-ware, it is impossible for a brain-ware to be active without user.  While in mind complexities the user of mankind are their conscience.

It is such an impossibilities for engines to have free-will.  Free-will are not random improbabilities over luck, free-will are mere human intellect to study and also choose prudently.  While a computer, mechanical engines, robot and alike may lasts for centuries yet not one had yet owned the capabilities of free-will.  Thus yet, interestingly robot can memorize better than human yet it is only caused by object-user perspective over data placement, not a responsible reaction over one free-will and interests.

Second, robot AI may think over things and solve problems yet it cannot integrate intuition like animals, mammals, or other biotic.  To create an algorithms that define intuition is nearly impossible. A car only can avoid danger but not to instantly safe all the people in it.  It is a common notice also that car can only hints where the nearest gas-station but cannot want that gas-station at will.  AI also may not hurdles research as much as human can create a mean; e.g. meaningful poem.

It would be such an interesting founding if we may see car that is thirsty over fuel and instantly go for the gas-station without anyone recognition; a system of algorithms may not change the DNA strands by itself except that a sample of such complexities are infused.  There are creative robots that may recreate from pattern as such that possibilities over which design unto which one, yet robot cannot choose which one is more beautiful than others unto mood also without being a user intact to the AI memories of multifunctional-wares thus made us able to intuitively recognize feelings.

Third, the last but not least is that AI cannot reproduce as how we complete a prudent reproduction by itself, it needs a host to do so, and if only that a robot may give births, it is only the artificial womb that works within an in-vitro of human based cells of sperm and ovaries.  It cannot happen that a robot impregnate other robots.  It is queer to see that AI may only give us a glimpse of realities but not the whole pictures with its meaningful content as well as contentment.

To noticing thus, we need to re-think, that our Civilization as human had been made centuries over centuries while AI are developed only in mere of this millennium, AI can only correct and not create without user. AI cannot be without its algorithms over all bodily system organs and most perpetuated stems.

In conclusion of this discussion over the inabilities of Artificial Intelligent over Human Intellects are that maybe one day there are going to be many wonders of innovations even totally human-like robot AI and so on, yet nothing can withdrawn that human are not the perfect creation perhaps over other up-going evolution to be better creatures; well, nobody knows when if we can create angels for reals by all that we have right to tell you some fantasy?  Perhaps, Christmas is going to be so different and the gifts are not sent by spooky point of a distant anyway, only the future when its present may solve the Schrodinger Cat whether it is dead or alive, we can only likened. Thus are the AI Inabilities over Human Intellects so far that I may think and argue of.

Frame of References & Relative Perspectives

Everyone who had studied Physics in Undergraduate must have crossed the special and general theories of relativity; thus lemma known through Einstein's Universe and Space-Time.  Although that happens to be true if and only if we observe two different vector changes in different frame referential.

One would know that though there may exists a particle which travel faster than light in pico-seconds, light-speed are still the common use of Physics generalization of Newtonian Fundamental Forces.  Perhaps thus momentum and impuls are not to be progressive but regressive, we may seen that as if violation of Thermodynamics are not unusual, yet understood that the Laws of Thermodynamics had to be obeyed for any Thermal and Dynamics to coexists as an order of science and Physics.

Though, why should one use frame of reference in relativity, especially in General Relativity?

Frame of reference are crucial understanding in mending General to Special Relativity.  Thus, also known as Referential Frame, this is one core understanding of the standing object of observation in human perspectives.  Surely we can change any frame of references to study things Astrophysical, yet we need to understand that in hyper mode, holograms tends to drawn things insufficiently, as such that light are the subject of measuring boundaries of lemmas and relativity of Einstein's Theorems.

As how it predominantly exhorted, in Einsteinian view, Space and Time are tangled just like DNA strands in biologi-molecular, yet this manner is not as dynamics.  For Einstein, Space comes as how Time also withdrawn, thus definition can make time as real when space are relatives.  By thus understanding we can see relative perspectives of Referential Frames.  This are also being studied by Hudson, and Heisenberg.  Uncertainty principle of Heisenberg makes do of other works by Pauli and Lagrange that Dirac measurement was correct, this somewhat shown as if Relativity are merely happening of Cosmological Constraints.  Yet, is that so?  What if the C as speed constant are changed into Bosons?

Some speculation are sought in Relative Perspectives, if and only if C = Bosons, any Referential Frames are relative too in its contingency of Perspectives.  E.g., a Singularity that is measured in C would fall when the Mandelbrot Series approaching infinity or are divided by zero matrix, yet when it is changed to Bosons, matter gets mass quicker than light this may make Physics think that time is holographic or else that reality are just perceptions.  These hyper-space inhibition by Richard G. made us known that spanning rheology of space-time is not as simple as fixing rhea-static of morphing roads.  This has made Referential Frame are Relative towards Perspectives Objection and of Observation upon the observer.

In conclusion of this discussion, Relative Perspectives may happen when Quantum and General Relativity are inter-tangled in observation depends on the observer main constraints.

The Impact of Boson's Velocity over Light

As we all known perhaps until 2014, light travel the fastest over all, yet after the discovery of Higg's Boson, now revolution of Physics happened that now consider Boson, theoretical particles that yield mass may have velocity faster than light by several commas.  This had made Quantum Physics compulsory to be studied unto research and relativity more interesting in its cosmo-metry.

First, Higg's Boson is a little bit much faster than the speed of light.  Second, Bosons carries mass over a theoretical particles in theoretical physics.  Third, it has been proven through CERN that Higg's Boson travel faster than the speed of light, therefore it is proven and only a theoretical notoriety anymore.  All these facts create more fields for Physicists and Scientists alike to develop more and more founding on the field of Physics, Mathematics, and other sciences at large.

Higg's Boson is a little bit much faster than the speed of light.  It is a Neutrinos that in Standard Model over the existence of Higgs Field.

Secondly, Bosons carry "mass" Forces over other theoretical particles.  Some even nicknamed this particles as 'God's Particle'.  It was founded by a Scottish Physicists named Peter Higgs whom predicted the existence of this particle. Bosons are a type of subatomic particles.

Third, OPERA within CERN experiment has founded yet that Higg's Boson discovery as a pivoting point over the researchers of Physicists then.  As it was found on 14 of March 2013, up until now, many Physicists are studying thus particles.  It gives mass through the Higg's Field over Quantum Fields as interactions with other matters. It was founded at ATLAS & CMS at CERN LHC.

Conclusively, we can make an assumptions that Quantum Field in some extent may travel faster than the speed of light not to create sight-seeing but more to the Poisson over its existence in The Universe; who knows, perhaps God has made another 'predestiny?'

Bibliography

https://blogs.voanews.com/science-world/2011/10/21/faster-than-the-speed-of-light-and-the-search-for-higgs-boson/

https://home.cern/topics/higgs-boson

Fibonacci Sequence in Fractal-Time

Gregg Braden - Fractal Time

In defining beauty and/or organized systems we may approach thus unto Fibonacci Sequence, an example are the beauty of a clam=shell that could be derived into Time-Based fractal when we combine both Fractal bases with Fourier Series.  There happened to be three arguments of theory in between, first is Einstaein-Podolsky-Rosen Relativity, Gregg Braden Fractim-Ttme, and Sequences Series Statistical Dynamics.

To imagine this sequence in fractal time, is not that simple/  Imagine you are living as flexible rubber that may go goosebumps or static=pure/elastic/  Therefore. these three understanding may conclude as FS/FT to be the main consequences of Fibonacci in Time Fractal.

[....] 

Physics Govern Our Universes, Words Connect Communications as

Have you ever lost somewhere about anything to talk to?  As an example, you had met the love of your life, have you ever thought of an inability to talk to that person?  Like those buzz over the stomachs and butterfly over your tummy, Physics also has its buzzes and butterflies over like frame over frame of the perspectives in relativity to the frames over frames of how our loved ones appear in our minds.

If, buzzers actually do have romance, then perhaps physics would also have flux.  Flux are verily strict over how the subjects of Electrodynamics made robust in the certainty on how such works over such, just like if you ever met a forming wind into tornado sometimes you can felt that the wind had changed however.  The Pedagogy of Scientific Methods are strict on it course when we go describing the commons between Words to Physics and Communications unto Universes.

As robots uses algorithms to function, Physics needed formulations of logic's-lemma-theories to structures.  In the links between robots and Physics it could be seen verily clear that all Physics basic norms always stated by three variables of comparative just like robot has three basics functional structures in its anticipations of the algorithmic datum.

Yet, also everything have basic fundamentals thus cannot be breached by each normative, jargon, and even tiny little bits of the utilization.

Languages are not laws, then a datum would neither meant an alphabet.  Says that, a variable of Voltage are V, Current are I, and Resistance are R, then V = I x R, yet it is not so that / -r -s in cmd. would be the same with I, You, We, and They in English Language.  The basics iteration would be agoristic to the grammar yet not generalized as colloquial.  This is an example of Robots Language:

This is an example of expert to advanced bio-system language (English Poetry):

As how we can see it, there are certain 'strangeness' in between these two orders, yet in some 'masses' both used a very different normative complexities in between theirs lucrative in between one packs of commands with a set of metaphors.

In other manners, we can see, these as advanced comparatives; these are complexities in Mathematical Accumulations of Frame Referential in Cosmology: 

   

While these others, are Morse Code used in League of Nations that were re-written on 2009:

Both needed endurance, intellects, severe analytic, and perseverance generally speaking.  So, could you ask your own-selves, "Does a dot in the mode of Morse Code really do not make any difference for the Cosmological Pattern if ever a dot were a glimpse of another luminescence of a star shown?"

Keep that to yourself so that you would make your own interpretation to the random sample that were asked.

Next, can you think of a mathematical elephant?  What do you see on your mind?  Keep it there.  Now, see a real elephant by searching on google.  Now, even though thus were similar in trigger, does that generally norms as 'elephant'?  It's just like saying that if all E = M x C x C, then all frame of reference to see an event in spherical conics of space-time Grand Theory would means that to see all lights as a static energy objects.  Yet, Thermodynamic has stated some in inferring mathematical constant that essentially Thermal are events that happen caused by dynamics in a process of progression.  Sometimes, it made me think that perhaps an AC/DC electronics would have a point of biased engineering if ever the environment are too dynamics; just imagine trying to fix a broken amplifier in a vacuum and fixing it on let's say 0.78 ATM world-like overview.  It's like using C++ without using a procedural methods yet reluctant by only copy-pasting the codes without knowing that as procedures or else sub-freezing the algorithm essentials for else if maintenance of robotic procedural trashes.  That would someday destroyed an satellite of servers if ever the data sent unto were unable to be recycled into something else, and perhaps valuated the main use of computing into recycling digital data; which means perhaps using bosonic nuclear properties to biased the use of computer into light recycling machine rather than computing methods.

These has benefits also reluctance,  the good thing is perhaps only by using enough microns to cosmology we could measures the evidence to Grand Theories yet, these could also meant in the sustainability that computers need to be possessed are considered to be basics right perhaps as the same as trees and houses.  So, perhaps we may see that manipulations of nature are more succulent which needs some orders to also create a typical algorithms to enable thus Technologies to be able to 'Communicate' freely with Natures.  I had a view that perhaps algorithms one day could actually help the genomic principles of nature only perhaps up to botanies, not to induce chemicals or interest based medicines, yet to dynamically create a, per-say, a botanic tree that is able to spread wi-fi through one of its instances, or a stone to sent a message if ever a person were missing in a jungle just by temporarily changing its features.

So, in accumulation of this abstractions article is that perhaps Physics Govern Universes just like dreams at night taking our subconscious words into someone else's dream at certain stage of brain activity just to send a simple word like, 'I Love You, I Miss You, Forgiveness, or Just I am Okay.'

Well, just say that words are to be seen as reality of our tastes, then it is just parallel that world are just a reality to our eyes, then what are the true realities of other senses?

Think for yourself, whether or not Physics does govern the universe like the words do to communications, does doing the wrong grammar felt similar to putting the wrong variables when it comes into communicating a case in laws with the outcome of scientific experiments?

Well, for me the difference are only that words could hypnotize while physics can mesmerizing-magnetized: and yes both are magical and fun when thus are successful!  In fact, the delta of statistics are just means of risks and improbabilities; still, nothing are 100% for anything even if you are a physicists or only a linguist or even a prophet of the olds because everything are a system that always make a different, wrong, right, unused or even important, to the whole thing, since cosmology start perhaps even when start do begin or start.  True that nothing can know the meaning of a physical norms until we understand that its philosophy and its engineering usage are understood completely and full essentially felt just like a crush to that cute girl or boy in the class.  Well, do not get confused though because sometimes stressful atmosphere can mistake us to seeing I = L.U for love confessions rather than calculating the engineering impedance of a civil-mechanization system.  So, do not falsely see mechantronics as lover robots, since a joke can never make a robot give you children out of making love can it?  Unless you are half robots, perhaps you might not felt this little weirdness of illusion to delusional instantaneous images.  

Well, in short conclusion abstraction are nonetheless a choice for us to philosophically choose how to creatively imagine the right answer to a problem with correctness and simplification to be understood by the problem givers and solvers.

Resources:

- MIT Open License Lecture from Youtube
- Math-Semantics
- Modules of Python and Arduino Uno