How Can Carbo Makes You Richer

Have you ever tried eating so many food that makes you feel fatter than you were previously were?  Or perhaps have you ever run so much that makes yourself breathing uncontrollably?  Those were the effect of Carbo on your diet.  Some dietrician said they are bad for you, some might say they are healthy to a certain point.  But, let us explore more to see how can Carbo makes you rich.

Carbo was shortened version of Carbohydrate, a substance that contains C up to 6 atoms in a molecule, chemically bounded with Oxygen by another 6 atoms, and Hydrogen at 12 atoms.  They seem to be pretty heavy molecules when mixed around in your diet aren't they?  Well, apparently Carbo are used by the body as a fuel to burn out our calories in which we took every day.  Just like a car with too much fuel, too much Carbo could get you loosened up a little and makes you feel a little fatter than before.  What makes Carbo super-special is that Carbo are made up by three elements those were naturally abundance in nature.  But, that's not the reason that Carbo could make you rich.

As mentioned earlier, Carbo were consisted of Carbon, or the C atom.  These atom actually were the base atom in graphite, the main ingredients in making pencils and suprisingly, if it is formed three-dimensionally, they could create one of the most precious gem in the whole wide world: The Diamonds.

Diamonds are structured in three-dimensional face centered cubic.  It means, there's at least 12 atoms in every lattice of a diamond.  The atom were mainly Carbons that is shaped accordingly to create an amazing shape that optically reflects light in precisely right amount of degree precision, just like seeing a rainbow after a heavy rainfall, naturally, diamond are made up after a legit years of deformation.  Well, what can make you rich is that we can now manufacture diamonds and if compared to natural diamonds, there are no really much difference!

What can you make even more richer from Carbo is that the Hydrogen element.  Hydrogen element were the most valuable element that we consume for living, if we merged it with Oxygens, two Hydrogen could make up a molecule of water!  That is 80% of our fluid are made up of this substance.  Yet, this is not why we could get rich.  If we do a reverse reduction on Hydrogen mainly water, we could actually create a combustive materials, a fluid materials that could be converted into fuel.  Water that is being reversed redox with addition of sodium chloride could create enough combustion to actually ignite you a small toy rockets from your backyard!  Imagine if you put enough catalyst and add several amount of potassium in it, it could even become an alternative energy resources that save the middle-east from going to war with each other! No, I was completely joking about the middle-east, well, it could potentially be an alternative energy for sure.

The third thing that could make you rich from Carbo, is of course, it is your main source energy that you consume everyday.  Almost 70% of your diet contain Carbohydrate, every time you do sport, you play baseball, or even walking to your apartment you are actually spending your Carbohydrate that you consumed from your breakfast, that is the reason why eating Carbo at night if you don't do really much work could get you in health trouble.

So, just imagine, what if you had diamonds, fuels, and the main source of food that we ate everyday in our diet, wouldn't we be ever rich enough?

Approach to Pattern Recognition

Sciences apart, people from different areas had tried to define things from philosophy.  The first was Archimides who faithfully admit his existence through the polemic of atom through the thinking of his predecessor; Socrates.  Time after time, new thinking had emerged as from the elements of nature, the indivisible parts of matters until the description of space introduced by Renee Descartes (1596 to 1650), Descart was describing space as four exclusionary divisible parts in the four Quad, The First Quad from the right up to The Fourth Quad on the down right, each happened to be counter-clockwise definite with approximation of measurements.  This was the beginning of pattern behavior recognition of human cognitive process.

Time after time, many scientists and mathematicians discovered new languages and technologies to thoroughly understand nature, one of the approach was cellular automata, the fourrier series, power series, up to the newest sugar based model anatomy of human blood stream in medical physics.  These advancements had many distinguished features to create a better life in humanity at large and all society.

Pattern.  Pattern means a period repetition, a pattern could be a palette of changes in the DNA, a fractal mode of Batik, a directions you go to school everyday, and even your time to sleep, play, and study every night.  Following a pattern means dissecting yourself into a period of continuous changes.

Recognition.  To reckon something means to understand and know that something has certain properties.  A reckoning means an awaken state of conscious to become aware of whatever that is being observe.  In this matter recognition refer to a dilluted perspective of having to see or cling to a certain reference frame of knowing, thinking, plausing, and finally creating.  It could be starting simply as your pattern of making your homework after going back from work or school.

There are many methods to approach a pattern.  In this article I would enlight at the least two methods of an approach to recognising a pattern.  First is chaos and order phenomenology approach, the second is rythmical periodic approach; verily intact with understanding of fourrier and harmonics.

Chaos is a state of disorder.  A chaos means there are nothing tangible enough for us to recognize and even to interact with that state to actually conclude that something was somewhat or somewhat was somehow or some sort.  Simply, it is the entangled wool of your cat on its favorites night; it's undefineable.

Order, in the other sense, is state of rest.  State of clarity between which is what and what is how.  It is like seeing a pretty and fine roads with the cars lining in the same speed and velocity.  Everything is clearly predictable.  Everything is in conduct of clean and calmness.  Sometimes, it is quite rigid to changes and verily detached from quakes.

Approaching a recognition of pattern through chaos and order could be made by seeing the phenomenon of such objective that is being observe e.g. the phenomena of occultism in the dark ages.  We could actually see the science behind such phenomenon dramatically by seeing five thorough questions of what, who, where, how, why such things happened.  What were the variables of change towards the chaos, was occultism a chaos or dark ages were chaos?  Which was the state of order? How would one define that there is such thing as occultism in the dark ages? And such forth.

Second approach is rythmical periodic approach.  A pattern should have a definite means of initiality.  In this sense, an initial could be the first point of a sine crests approaching it first cartesian point to create another crests or simply the start of wave in a wavelength.  A rythm if succeeded to precede a term of multiplications could then be called harmonics.  A harmonic is a state where everything is periodically predictable and observable through at the minimum, a mathematical understanding.

How then should be approach pattern through rythmical approach?  As it is said, a pattern could then be define through fourrier function in which define the initial and the form of periodic quasi-stable changes in a term.  As such, then power functions would then be extensify in the means of complexion.

Finally, as such things are there so existed.  What would then be the use of a pattern, anyway?